[Users] Reply to List

[Ricardo Mones]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:27:56PM +0300, Removed GDPR wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:43:41 -0000 Paul wrote:
> 
> > Probably, as I said, this is because the standard
> > List headers were missing, so the personal address
> > was the fallback.
> 
> You are right. The List headers are totally missing in
> the 2 lists I checked.

Have you tried to contact their admins and gently suggest them to add
standard list headers?

Talking to people can be surprisingly effective sometimes :-)

> Would it make sense to make "Reply to List" intelligently handle such
> cases?

You can't, unless you record somewhere which address is a mailing list
(e.g.: http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#lists)

> Such as showing a message: "Hey, there are no list headers in the
> message you are replying to. Which address would you like to send to?"
> (+ selection UI) Of course that wouldn't fix the bad way others reply
> but at least one can take care for one's own messages to be sent
> properly. What do you say?

As described such feature becomes annoying after dialog showing twice.

Once selected it should be recorded to avoid re-asking for the same
address again and again. That way could be useful and less irritating ;-)

regards,
-- 
  Ricardo Mones 
  ~
  RTFM - "Read The Manual" (The 'F' is silent). Usually a very good 
  idea.                                             Bjarne Stroustrup

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180830/ab8c85a1/attachment.sig>