[Users] extended search shot circuit

Colin Leroy colin at colino.net
Mon Oct 19 22:50:11 CEST 2015

Yes, it does; priority is left to right. 
I usually prefix body searches with f or al to get speedier results. 

Le 19 octobre 2015 22:42:33 GMT+02:00, "Ethy H. Brito" <ethy.brito at inexo.com.br> a écrit :
>Does extended search benefit from boolean short circuits?
>For instance, "f mr_Doe & b some_text" behaves substantially different
>"b some_text & f mr_Doe"?
>I ask those because extended search is annoyingly slow.
>I am trying to find an email from mr_doe that contains some_word for
>more than 5 minutes now. Gave up!
>I did the search from command line in a few seconds (three to be
>precise) using grep and xargs!
>~/.claws-mail/imapcache/ at here/INBOX$ grep -l "From:.*danton"
>1* | \
>	xargs grep -i some_word
>I am certainly doing something very wrong with claws!
>Users mailing list
>Users at lists.claws-mail.org

Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20151019/f623b763/attachment.html>

More information about the Users mailing list