[Users] extended search shot circuit

[Ethy H. Brito]

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:50:11 +0200
Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> Yes, it does; priority is left to right. 
> I usually prefix body searches with f or al to get speedier results. 

I suspected that, since it is a "C" descendant program.

But my times are too high.

I am using "f mr_doe & b some_word". 
It is running now for more than 5 minutes for a universe of 5500 INBOX emails.

Is there a limit on the number of chained expressions?
"... & ... & ... & ..." is a valid expression?

I get a red background input field when I add the third "&"!


Ethy



> 
> 
> Le 19 octobre 2015 22:42:33 GMT+02:00, "Ethy H. Brito"
> <ethy.brito at inexo.com.br> a écrit :
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >Does extended search benefit from boolean short circuits?
> >For instance, "f mr_Doe & b some_text" behaves substantially different
> >from 
> >"b some_text & f mr_Doe"?
> >
> >I ask those because extended search is annoyingly slow.
> >
> >I am trying to find an email from mr_doe that contains some_word for
> >more than 5 minutes now. Gave up!
> >I did the search from command line in a few seconds (three to be
> >precise) using grep and xargs!
> >
> >~/.claws-mail/imapcache/1.1.1.1/me at here/INBOX$ grep -l "From:.*danton"
> >1* | \
> >	xargs grep -i some_word
> >
> >I am certainly doing something very wrong with claws!
> >
> >Pointers?
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Ethy
> >_______________________________________________
> >Users mailing list
> >Users at lists.claws-mail.org
> >http://lists.claws-mail.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> -- 
> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.

-- 

Ethy H. Brito         /"\
InterNexo Ltda.       \ /  CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
+55 (12) 3797-6860     X   ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
S.J.Campos - Brasil   / \ 
 
PGP key: http://www.inexo.com.br/~ethy/0xC3F222A0.asc