[Users] extended search shot circuit
Ethy H. Brito
ethy.brito at inexo.com.br
Mon Oct 19 22:59:17 CEST 2015
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:50:11 +0200
Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> wrote:
> Yes, it does; priority is left to right.
> I usually prefix body searches with f or al to get speedier results.
I suspected that, since it is a "C" descendant program.
But my times are too high.
I am using "f mr_doe & b some_word".
It is running now for more than 5 minutes for a universe of 5500 INBOX emails.
Is there a limit on the number of chained expressions?
"... & ... & ... & ..." is a valid expression?
I get a red background input field when I add the third "&"!
> Le 19 octobre 2015 22:42:33 GMT+02:00, "Ethy H. Brito"
> <ethy.brito at inexo.com.br> a écrit :
> >Does extended search benefit from boolean short circuits?
> >For instance, "f mr_Doe & b some_text" behaves substantially different
> >"b some_text & f mr_Doe"?
> >I ask those because extended search is annoyingly slow.
> >I am trying to find an email from mr_doe that contains some_word for
> >more than 5 minutes now. Gave up!
> >I did the search from command line in a few seconds (three to be
> >precise) using grep and xargs!
> >~/.claws-mail/imapcache/184.108.40.206/me at here/INBOX$ grep -l "From:.*danton"
> >1* | \
> > xargs grep -i some_word
> >I am certainly doing something very wrong with claws!
> >Users mailing list
> >Users at lists.claws-mail.org
> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
Ethy H. Brito /"\
InterNexo Ltda. \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
+55 (12) 3797-6860 X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
S.J.Campos - Brasil / \
PGP key: http://www.inexo.com.br/~ethy/0xC3F222A0.asc
More information about the Users