[Users] Filter rule combinations
subscript at free.fr
Mon Mar 25 11:56:38 CET 2019
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:31:08 +0000 Adrian <adrian at aeolian.org.uk> wrote:
> Thank you wwp
> In fact, I'd solved my own problem without knowing it. The AND NOT
> part of the condition was done by a separate filter handling those
> cases, that had higher priority. This must solve some problems of this
> sort, but all.
Which is probably better, since using one filter rule for filtering
several purposes doesn't seem a good idea to me. Anyway, I think that
you didn't explore the wide possibilities of expressions building in
filtering rules ;-).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Users