[Users] Filter rule combinations

[wwp]

Hello Adrian,


On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:31:08 +0000 Adrian <adrian at aeolian.org.uk> wrote:

> Thank you wwp
> 
> In fact, I'd solved my own problem without knowing it.  The AND NOT
> part of the condition was done by a separate filter handling those
> cases, that had higher priority.  This must solve some problems of this
> sort, but all.

Which is probably better, since using one filter rule for filtering
several purposes doesn't seem a good idea to me. Anyway, I think that
you didn't explore the wide possibilities of expressions building in
filtering rules ;-).


Regards,

-- 
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190325/f8b2401d/attachment.sig>