[Users] FYI: Bad date formats and sorting...
jseymour at LinxNet.com
Wed Jun 1 12:40:28 CEST 2016
On Tue, 31 May 2016 18:12:05 -0400
Pierre Fortin <pf at pfortin.com> wrote:
> Thought this might be useful info about date sorting...
> Last week, I received some mail which didn't appear where it should in
> the list of messages. Discovered the problem to be due to the sender
> using an antiquated date format. Sent them the following and still
> haven't heard back...
> >It should read:
> > Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 22:23:29 -0400
> >not: Date: Wed May 25 22:23:29 EDT 2016
> >Your Date causes incorrect sort-by-date at the receiving end.
> >See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-4.3
> The sender...? US-CERT! The guys who keep tabs on
> vulnerabilities... sure inspires confidence... :/
Odd. I just looked at my CERT folder:
| Subject: TA16-144A: WPAD Name Collision Vulnerability
| Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:22:06 -0500
| To: jseymour at linxnet.com
| From: "US-CERT" <US-CERT at ncas.us-cert.gov>
Looks right to me.
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.
More information about the Users