[Users] Is this really a list for users, or rather for programmers?

[wwp]

Hello Steve,


On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:15:07 -0400 Steve Litt <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:52:14 +0200
> Andrej Kacian <andrej at kacian.sk> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:56:15 +0200
> > Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:47:14 +0100, Paul wrote:
> > > >On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:43:38 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: 
> > > >
> > > >> Which one? One of those
> > > >> 
> > > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/claw-dev
> > > >> https://lists.rit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/claws-dev ?
> > > >
> > > >Those two are for an entirely unrelated project.
> > > 
> > > And the claws-mail developers list is top secret?
> > > 
> > > Another link I provided explains why bug reports are send to the
> > > user's list and you corrected Slavko, that there's a developer list.
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason that nobody subscribed to this list should know
> > > the claws-mail developers list?
> > 
> > You're all making a mountain out of a molehill. The developers'
> > mailing list receives less traffic per month than this thread did in
> > just two days. Occasional patch draft asking for
> > comments/improvement, or a code-related question from one team member
> > to another, but in reality, the list is pretty under-used.
> 
> Yes. Also, this whole thread is an attempt to mountainize a molehill. I
> just checked, and the first post of this thread was, from my archives,
> the Original Poster's (OP's) first post to this mailing list, and he
> said he was "interested in Claws", not that he was using Claws. And
> then he threatened to leave this list. Many of us have been using
> Claws for years, some of us (not me) have been coding Claws. When a
> noob comes on and tells us how to do our business, and tells us to
> split our mailing list, why reply at all?
> 
> I'm just as happy with the list now as I was before the OP made his
> drive-by suggestion: No changes needed.

+1 with this.


Regards,

-- 
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150717/4acc85a8/attachment.sig>