[Users] [Bug 3297] mark thread read
Ricardo Mones
ricardo at mones.org
Tue Oct 14 12:47:09 CEST 2014
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:55:27PM +1100, blind Pete wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:37:52 +0000
> noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk wrote:
>
> > http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3297
> >
> > Paul <paul at claws-mail.org> changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Severity|normal |enhancement
> >
> > --- Comment #1 from Paul <paul at claws-mail.org> ---
> > "this one-selected-line represents all messages in the thread because
> > it is folded" is purely your own interpretation.
>
> This is a User Interface design question.
>
> The UI should be simple, clear and unambiguous. If there is any need,
> or even possibility, of interpretation, then there is room for
> improvement.
Current menu reads (modulo accelerators):
〜〜〜〜〜〜〜
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┼────────────────────┐
│ Mark 〉│ Mark │
〜〜〜〜〜〜〜 │ Unmark │
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┤
│ Mark as unread │
│ Mark as read │
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┤
│ Mark all read │
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┤
│ Ignore thread │
│ Unignore thread │
│ Watch thread │
│ Unwatch thread │
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┤
│ Mark as spam │
│ Mark as ham │
├┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┤
│ Lock │
│ Unlock │
└────────────────────┘
While grouping could be somehow improved, what makes you think that
options not surnamed with ‘thread’ do apply to threads?
Repeating ‘message’ everywhere only clutters it more IMO.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141014/5fa3c9dc/attachment.sig>
More information about the Users
mailing list