[Users] Schedule for Ubuntu PPA Update
h.m.brand at xs4all.nl
Sun May 12 09:35:28 CEST 2013
On Sat, 11 May 2013 17:52:51 -0700, sylpheed at 911networks.com wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 08:36:37 +0900
> Charles Lipton <crlipton at gol.com> wrote:
> > I am completely dissatisfied with Fancy and consider it a work in
> > progress that needs to be taken back behind the wall for more work
> > before it gets inflicted on the public again.
> I'm the public. I use Fancy and I like it.
> I prefer it to gtkhtml2.
I have no real preference. I don't like HTML mail in the first place,
so when I (have to) look at those, I am annoyed a little already, but
that has nothing to do with the mail client or its plugins. It is the
sender of those mails that are to blame.
> I'm very happy for Fancy, it has just the right amount of features for me.
Same here. I'm just wondering why some HTML mail does not show its
images in Fancy, but I can live with that. I never even started
> I do take offense of how you talk to the developers. Politeness and
> civility goes a long way when you want somebody to help you.
> If you do not like 391, stay with 390 or find some other software
> (thunderbird, balsa, pine, mutt...) or write your own...
> BTW, I want to thank everybody for all the hard work.
Same from here!
H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.17 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
More information about the Users