[Users] Suggestion to remove "Mark all read" from message context menu
Michael Gmelin
freebsd at grem.de
Sat Aug 11 18:10:22 CEST 2012
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:41:24 +0200
Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> wrote:
> On 11 August 2012 at 13h02, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I would suggest removing "Mark all read" from the "Mark" section of
> > the message list context menu or the following reasons:
> >
> > - This is the only entry in the entire menu that doesn't work in the
> > context of the selected message(s), but on the folder as a whole
> > - The option already exists in the folder tree context menu (where
> > it belongs in my opinion, since it works in the context of the
> > folder)
> > - It's right next to "Mark as read", which is a commonly used action
> > without a default keyboard shortcut and it's really easy to select
> > it by accident
>
> Don't forget about thousands of users who like this menu item there.
That's kind of a though-terminating argument though :)
> It may be easy to select by mistake, but it has its place in the main
> menu,
I was talking about the context menu (right click on message list), not
the main menu - I don't think it's wrong to have it in there. I just
think that a context menu should always work on the selected item(s)
(general UI paradigm).
Personally, I don't have much need to mark all emails as read anyway
(not part of my work flow), if I had to I would probably use
CTRL-A to select all messages and then select the action I want to
apply (read/unread/mark/watch etc.).
> and also there's a confirmation asked when one chooses Mark all
> read, unless it has been dismissed with "Don't ask me again".
That's useful.
It also might be useful to add an extra menu separator before the menu
entry, like:
Mark
Unmark
----------------
Mark as unread
Mark as read
----------------
Mark all read
----------------
...
> In that
> case, the confirmation dialog can be re-enabled using
> Configuration/Preferences/Summaries - "Confirm before marking all
> messages in folder as read".
For some reason I managed to get all my messages set as read, even
though the dialog was configured to be on - and I just tested it shows
up - probably my mistake.
Maybe it was the labelling of the buttons (No/Yes questions tend to be
dangerous) [ Mark all unread ] [ Cancel ] might be a more fool proof
alternative.
>
> Short answer, I'm not in favor of removing it...
I'm not expecting to get it my way ;)
--
Michael Gmelin
More information about the Users
mailing list