[Users] The reply mark in subject (R: Re:) recognition

Michael Rasmussen mir at miras.org
Wed Aug 8 14:24:49 CEST 2012

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:06:38 -0400
Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote:

> The problem here is clearly the use of the word "MAY"⁽¹⁾.
Yes, may in a RFC means this functionality is optional but if the
functionality is included the functionally "MUST" respect the RFC which
means a subject line indicating this is a reply to another mail MUST
use, and ONLY use, Re: to indicate this.

Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
mir <at> miras <dot> org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120808/0e782edb/attachment.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list