[Users] The reply mark in subject (R: Re:) recognition

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:06:38 -0400
Jerry <jerry at seibercom.net> wrote:

> 
> The problem here is clearly the use of the word "MAY"⁽¹⁾.
> 
Yes, may in a RFC means this functionality is optional but if the
functionality is included the functionally "MUST" respect the RFC which
means a subject line indicating this is a reply to another mail MUST
use, and ONLY use, Re: to indicate this.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120808/0e782edb/attachment.sig>