[Users] The reply mark in subject (R: Re:) recognition

[Jerry]

On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:03:53 +0200
Michael Rasmussen articulated:

> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:28:03 +0200
> Michael Gmelin <freebsd at grem.de> wrote:
> 
> > In that case AW: should be added as well (that's what German
> > Outlook does)
> > 
> And Danish Outlook SV:
> And in French Outlook use something else, and in Spanish something
> else, and .....
> 
> Where should we stop bending claws' nature to satisfy brain dead
> developers/companies which reads a RFC like the Devil reads the Bible?

Refresh my memory; which RFC deals specifically with this?

-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120807/b5355b14/attachment.sig>