[Users] [Bug 4435] New: CXX test in configure.ac fails. liteHTML never gets built
noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk
noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk
Thu Jan 28 19:00:42 UTC 2021
https://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4435
Bug ID: 4435
Summary: CXX test in configure.ac fails. liteHTML never gets
built
Product: Claws Mail
Version: 3.17.8
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Plugins/LiteHTML Viewer
Assignee: users at lists.claws-mail.org
Reporter: pete at peterhyman.com
Desc: If AC_PROG_CXX finds a C++ compiler, it returns the full path. This
breaks AC_PATH_PROG.
Commit:
https://git.claws-mail.org/?p=claws.git;a=commit;h=b38631b3badc0e7509994e7631a454309dcb1f44
My autoconf: 2.69
automake 1.16.2
Kernel 5.10.8
GLIB-2.0 = 2.66
Claws-Mail = 3.17.8
This section of configure.ac always fails:
AC_PROG_CXX
AC_PATH_PROG(REAL_CXX, $CXX)
HAVE_CXX=no
if test -n "$REAL_CXX"; then
HAVE_CXX=yes
fi
Because AC_PATH_PROG just wants a program name, not a path and program name,
HAVE_CXX will always be `no' and liteHTML will never be built.
Here is configure output for the section shown above. The last line shows the
fail.
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether /usr/bin/g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of /usr/bin/g++... gcc3
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /usr/bin/g++ -E
checking for ld used by /usr/bin/g++... /usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) is GNU ld... yes
checking whether the /usr/bin/g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports
shared libraries... yes
checking for /usr/bin/g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
checking if /usr/bin/g++ PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if /usr/bin/g++ static flag -static works... yes
checking if /usr/bin/g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if /usr/bin/g++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
checking whether the /usr/bin/g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports
shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... (cached) GNU/Linux ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking for /usr/bin/g++... no
I tried to figure out an alternative, but could not. I'm not sure this test is
necessary because AC_PROG_CXX is robust. Maybe even it's a bug in autotools.
Stripping the path from CXX variable, the result is:
checking for g++... /usr/bin/g++
and litehtml is built.
If there was a way to parse out the path from the C++ command, this would work.
Perhaps something with m4_esyscmd and `cut'??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Users
mailing list