[Users] Reply to All as default?

[Heitor]

> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 14:25:11 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >IMO, if there is a real need for "Reply to All", more than very
> >occasionally, it's probably a good idea to think in terms of a
> >mailing list.

There are cases that crating mailing lists are very overkill: I was in
the organization of a conference here, in financial team. We needed to
contact companies for sponsorship and to quote some services. All
emails we sent went for 3 people: 2 in the team and the company. And
several times someone hit "Reply" instead of "Reply to All"...

I can give several other examples, but there's no need for that. "Reply
to All" is useful but not for all threads.

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:26:53 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <kde.lists at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm in favour of proper mailing list settings and Claws' way, to
> invoke a reply to a mailing list via the reply option, but I have
> given up. The Claws developers should consider to invoke a mailing
> list reply via the reply to all option, since this unfortunately
> would cause less trouble nowadays.

I also like how Claws work with mailing lists, it is very helpful. Btw,
Ralf Mardorf your email was marked as $Phishing by Gmail, I saw it by
accident in my SPAM folder.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190709/4f319c39/attachment-0001.sig>