[Users] reply to list

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 01:14:19 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <silver.bullet at zoho.com> wrote:

> 
> Actually the OP is used to MUAs that invoke the mailing list reply by
> the "All", aka "Group Reply", MUAs that in addition ignore "Reply-to",
> hence a different behaviour related to the received headers. There are
> valid reasons for both behaviours, the Claws behaviour and the behaviour
> of other MUAs.
> 
MUA's that ignores REPLY-TO headers violates the RFC thereby by
definition is defective by design.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
"Rembrandt's first name was Beauregard, which is why he never used it."
		-- Dave Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160921/29095647/attachment.sig>