[Users] [Bug 2176] autochk_interval granularity is low

[noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk]

http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2176

--- Comment #10 from Ricardo Mones <mones at users.sourceforge.net> ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I thought case 1 should come after case 0 in a switch(), not before, and the
> indentation inside case 1 code looks a bit iffy (mixed tabs and spaces), but
> apart from that, the patch looks good to me (and works well). :)

Oops, I hadn't realized of the inverse order. For some reason I saw it like a
stack of changes and seemed natural to put new versions on top of older, but no
problem in reversing it and fixing indentation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.