[Users] Scary composer feature: disappearing address fields
blind Pete
peter_s_d at fastmail.com.au
Fri Jan 29 09:41:21 CET 2016
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:13 +0100
Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:38:20 +1100, blind Pete wrote:
> >Ah, the default. Seasoned users have adjusted it to suit themselves,
> >as they should, but beginners should be presented with "obvious mode"
> >rather than "race tuned" mode.
>
> If the default becomes ...
>
> ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │From: [Foo v][foo at b.ar ]│
> │[To: ][v][users at lists.claws-mail.org ][<x]│
> │[To: ][v][ ][<x]│
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> │ │
> └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Subject: [ Re: [Users] Scary composer feature ]│
> └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬─┐
> │... people perhaps will complain about the wasted, empty,│ │
> │unused space of the addresses section, that is missing │ │
> │for the message body section. ;) │█│
> │ │█│
> │-- │█│
> │Barbie hypocrisy │█│
> │Mattel's female dolls got human shapes. │█│
> │What about Mattel's male dolls? │█│
> │Isn't this female sexism, misandry? │█│
> └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴─┘
Hopefully, that would be more obvious than the current situation. It
would be usable and the people who adjust things would adjust things to
suit, rather than panic-ing when their address disappears.
A *non* integer pane size would be more obvious. Two and a lines look
very different from two or three. It is more striking than the
difference between two and three.
--
testing
bP
More information about the Users
mailing list