[Users] Scary composer feature: disappearing address fields
subscript at free.fr
Thu Jan 28 19:36:51 CET 2016
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:30:38 -0700 Charlie Kravetz <cjk at teamcharliesangels.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:36:34 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:28:05 +0100, help123 at dobrynin.us wrote:
> >>And, indeed, that's what Pierre now confirms.
> >We are humans, so we sometimes miss the forest for the trees. Anyway,
> >there's no need to change the design in an unusual way. Keeping the
> >design in the most common way, is the best solution.
> Instead of designing for the smallest possible device, designing for
> usability would work. The area used to be 5 lines, now it defaults to
> two. Taking it back to 5 lines would eliminate most of these issues.
> - --
> Charlie Kravetz
> Linux Registered User Number 425914
> Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com]
The ruler still exist to make more room.
And it's not really 2 in fact, it's N+1, where N is the necessary
sufficient number of recipient header(s) following the context (1 when
composing, 1 or more when replying, etc.). +1 being for a new recipient
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Users