[Users] Scary composer feature: disappearing address fields

[wwp]

Hello Charlie,


On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:30:38 -0700 Charlie Kravetz <cjk at teamcharliesangels.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:36:34 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:28:05 +0100, help123 at dobrynin.us wrote:  
> >>And, indeed, that's what Pierre now confirms.    
> >
> >We are humans, so we sometimes miss the forest for the trees. Anyway,
> >there's no need to change the design in an unusual way. Keeping the
> >design in the most common way, is the best solution.
> >
> >https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/33/The_Design_of_Everyday_Things_%28cover_1988%29.jpg
> >
> >;)
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ralf  
> 
> 
> Instead of designing for the smallest possible device, designing for
> usability would work. The area used to be 5 lines, now it defaults to
> two. Taking it back to 5 lines would eliminate most of these issues.
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Charlie Kravetz
> Linux Registered User Number 425914
> [http://linuxcounter.net/user/425914.html]
> Never let anyone steal your DREAM.   [http://keepingdreams.com]

The ruler still exist to make more room.

And it's not really 2 in fact, it's N+1, where N is the necessary
sufficient number of recipient header(s) following the context (1 when
composing, 1 or more when replying, etc.). +1 being for a new recipient
to add.


Regards,

-- 
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160128/8a8a9e6d/attachment.sig>