[Users] Deleting one long thread
francis.moro at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 07:38:02 CEST 2015
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Paul <claws at thewildbeast.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:30:34 +0200
> Ralf Hutter <rhutter at posteo.de> wrote:
>> To be fair: Out of the 3 people giving their opinion before your
>> last email, paul (in your first email you didn't seem to give an
>> opinion but rather a hint on a kind of workaround), 2 were saying
>> that they dislike the current way it works.
> The way it currently works is not an accident, but represents the dev
> team's opinion on how it should work. Since this is implicit, I
> didn't think it was worth a mention, but since you seem to be not
> taking that into consideration, I've mentioned it now.
Ok, the dev team thinks it's how it should work but haven't explained
why they think so:
Why does the dev team think that collapsing the entire thread and
press SUPPR on the root email of the thread should delete the root
email only and let a partially broken thread (ie a thread with missing
Seriously I really don't see any reason this is superior than delete
the whole thread.
More information about the Users