[Users] reply-to-list annoyance

[Paul Rolland (=?UTF-8?B?44Od44O844Or44O744Ot44Op44Oz?=)]

Hello,

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:39:13 +0100
Michael <codejodler at gmx.ch> wrote:

> 
> Me too often run into this trouble.
> 
> I wonder if there's any valid intention, for senders, to reply with
> private mail as TO: when answering to a list -- or is it always rather a
> (little) mistake ? I have to admit i never tried to mix up list with
> offlist recipients, so maybe lack insight.
> 
> If it was a regular mistake, and there just no sane reason to do it, then
> i wonder if that kind of mistake couldn't be corrected just regularly, by
> the MUA, right before any such mail gets delivered. Like setting TO to
> the list, automaticly, and putting anybody else into CC, while dropping
> any CCs that can be identified as on list too.

Being the faulty who did the first mistake in this thread, let me explain
why.
I'm using Claws for my $DAYJOB, as well as many lists. But for $DAYJOB, I
often have to reply to multiple persons and using Ctrl+Shit+R (Reply All),
which I'm unfortunately also sometimes using when doing an ML reply...

And keeping the ability to have list+origin sender is important, as some ML
allow posting from non-member, who you want to copy when replying ;)

Many things were written, but IMHO, this is not Claws fault, but mine and
only mine.

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150130/ab3ee4ac/attachment.sig>