[Users] SMIME - Validity Discrepancies.
Ricardo Mones
ricardo at mones.org
Wed Sep 17 10:20:15 CEST 2014
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:00:30PM -0400, ENI wrote:
[…]
> Receiver sees the Signature OK icon, and the statement "Good signature
> from <sender name>".
>
> If the receiver clicks on the Signature OK icon, the message pane
> conveys:
>
> Good signature from
> uid "CN=<redacted>" (Validity: Unknown)
> uid "<redacted>" (Validity: Unknown)
>
> Q2 - Why the discrepancy (Signature OK vs. Validity:Unknown)?
There's no discrepancy, these are different concepts:
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html
HTH,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but
that's not why we do it. Richard Feynman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140917/17a3c57a/attachment.sig>
More information about the Users
mailing list