[Users] Downloads for offline use need to be multi-threaded for speed

[Steve Litt]

On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 22:21:55 +0530
Rajib Bandopadhyay <bkpsusmitaa at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/09/2014, Ricardo Mones
> <ricardo at mones.org> wrote:
> ...
> [snipped]
> >> ... Perhaps
> >> it will take no more than a few extra
> >> lines of code.
> > 
> > Priceless! Best joke on this list in
> > years!
> > 
> > Thanks for the amusing moment :-)
> ...
> [/snipped]
> 
> Please, Sir! Your email is being
> perceived to hurt my feelings and insult
> me 

[snip]

> 
> The same reply goes for Steve, whose
> message is posted below.

So should we take your assertion, that I insulted you just like Ricardo
supposedly did, to be a refusal to download the code and look at it?

Look at the code, Rajib, and then give us your opinion of how hard or
easy it will be to put in threading. This isn't an insult, but I
suppose it could be considered a challenge.

SteveT

Steve Litt                *  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance


> 
> On 07/09/2014, Steve Litt
> <slitt at troubleshooters.com> wrote:
> 
> [snipped]
> ...
> > You should probably download and look
> > at the code before thinking there
> > would be any possibility of
> > multithreading might be a few extra
> > lines of code.
> > 
> > I once tried to add code to turn the
> > regular (not the extended) search
> > into a recursive search. That sounds
> > simple, doesn't it? It wasn't. I gave
> > up after three hours of trying to
> > figure out which code to put in a
> > recursive loop.
> ...