[Users] Bug? in V3.8.1

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:29:35 +0100
Andrej Kacian <andrej at kacian.sk> wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:19:00 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Is there a valid reason to limit it?
> 
> Not really, but the function that creates the widget requires some
> upper limit.
> 
> Well, not exactly, it can exist without limits, but giving it only
> lower limit without the upper one is not allowed - and since negative
> values wouldn't make sense here, we need to have a lower limit of 0.

I'm new to Claws, so I likely will be six feed under, before the limit
could become an issue for me. I don't know for how many years Claws
already exists, so my calculation might be not hard enough. Perhaps
others already have mails that are many years old + a longer lifespan.
With my old C64 and Atari data the date sometimes is a minor issue.

IOW if it should be much effort to rewrite the code to provide an
unlimited value, then IMO it's not worth the effort. Assumed it should
be easy to provide an unlimited value, consider to provide it.