[Users] [Bug 3085] New: "Thread by Subject" sometimes requires a prefix (e.g. RE: ) sometimes does not when deciding if messages are part of same thread
noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk
noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk
Fri Feb 7 18:21:56 CET 2014
http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3085
Bug ID: 3085
Summary: "Thread by Subject" sometimes requires a prefix (e.g.
RE: ) sometimes does not when deciding if messages are
part of same thread
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Claws Mail
Version: GIT
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: UI/Message List
Assignee: users at lists.claws-mail.org
Reporter: aidenn0 at geocities.com
subject_hastable_lookup and subject_table_lookup are both used, but behave
differently.
Personally, I prefer that messages that are identical in subject be threaded
together, but either way, it should probably be consistent.
Changing the "if (prefix_length <= 0)" to "if (prefix_length < 0)" in
subject_hashtable_lookup gets the behavior that I expected, but I understand if
that's not the intended behavior of the feature.
To reproduce, you can have a mailbox with 2 messages with identical subjects,
but none of the threading related headers; they will not show up as threaded in
the thread view, but they will both be marked as ignored if you select "ignore
thread" on one of them.
I noticed also that the code for handling moved messagese uses
subject_table_lookup but I'm not sure if any odd behavior happens due to that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Users
mailing list