[Users] Message-ID
Rich Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 15:27:02 CET 2013
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:24:28 +0000
RW <rwmaillists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> IMO the existence of unreliable workarounds for something doesn't
> imply that that something is not needed.
I repeat: there is no standards-compliant method for threading mail
messages. Therefore every threading algorithm is a workaround.
To call all of them unreliable in the face of them working reliably for
fifteen-plus years is insulting to those people who solved the problem.
--
Rich P.
More information about the Users
mailing list