[Users] [Bug 2905] Include the signature timestamp in the 'full signature information'

[noreply at thewildbeast.co.uk]

http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2905

--- Comment #2 from Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> ---
Thanks for taking care of this, Ricardo.

I didn't add the " on " myself, to keep the line consistent with the "gpg
--verify" output.

If the previous resemblance wasn't actually by design, I have no concerns about
your modification and this is just FYI in case the omission was interpreted as
an unintentional grammar issue.

As a potential additional improvement on my original patch I suspect that it
might make sense to check sig->timestamp for 0 and use something like "no
timestamp set" instead of an most-likely incorrect date.

I believe the timestamp packet is technically not required by the OpenPGP RFCs,
but so far I haven't seen a real world message where it doesn't exist and I'm
not too familiar with the gpgme internals.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.