[Users] Unix domain socket directory

[Ricardo Mones]

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:58:57 -0400
ratinox at gweep.net wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:31:38 +0200
> Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, that's the goal indeed.
> 
> So, it's working as intended but with some consequences in atypical
> environments.
> 
> Is a --alternate-socket-dir option worth having beyond my own needs?

  I don't think is a worth to have option, because a workaround exists, like
  using NTFS (which also supports encryption) instead of FAT.

  regards,
-- 
  Ricardo Mones 
  ~
  Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but 
  that's not why we do it.                            Richard Feynman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120926/1966e20a/attachment.sig>