[Users] Unix domain socket directory
ricardo at mones.org
Wed Sep 26 09:46:14 CEST 2012
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:58:57 -0400
ratinox at gweep.net wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:31:38 +0200
> Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> wrote:
> > Yes, that's the goal indeed.
> So, it's working as intended but with some consequences in atypical
> Is a --alternate-socket-dir option worth having beyond my own needs?
I don't think is a worth to have option, because a workaround exists, like
using NTFS (which also supports encryption) instead of FAT.
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but
that's not why we do it. Richard Feynman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Users