[Users] I hate HTML mail; but...
higuita
higuita7 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jun 18 03:29:27 CEST 2012
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:33:23 -0400, Pierre Fortin <pf at pfortin.com> wrote:
(...)
> Forward as Attachment: what the text looks like is only visible to the
> recipient; but it looks fine -- just as it does when the text version is
> displayed on the original message.
>
> So this begs the question: does Forward use a different code segment?
Forward as attach will not touch the original mail, it will just
be attached to your email and the recipient email client will display it
just like it received the email itself.
Normal forward will take the text and put it on your composing
window... as it doesnt support html, it will show only the text
version of the email or the striped html version, if there is no text
version.
Anyway, you dont need html to reply, if you really need the
original html version, forward as attach or reply and attach the
old email.
The only occasion i do miss html is when i need to correct
a table sent via html... small ones one can fake with text, but
bigger ones are harder.
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.
-- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120618/16210c06/attachment.sig>
More information about the Users
mailing list