[Users] Processing Rules: Header defined

wwp subscript at free.fr
Wed Feb 1 11:42:28 CET 2012

Hello Christian,

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:33:18 +0100 Christian Hesse <list at eworm.de> wrote:

> Hello everybody,
> when creating processing rules for headers you can choose whether they
> contain a string or do not contain a string.
> My mobile phone stores sent Mails without a Date header set. Therefore I
> would like to have check "header exists". Is there something like that? Any
> reason not to implement it?

There's no such rule, you can you use a regexp rule to match "." (w/o
the quotes, . meaning any character in regexp). That way only an
existing, non-empty value will match.

Why isn't there a "header exists"? Well.. hmm, I don't have a precise
answer - I remember this topic raising from time to time - because
regexp . is enough to test it maybe?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120201/cae544af/attachment.sig>

More information about the Users mailing list