[Users] [Bug 2828] Use MD5 digest for socket name

Holger Berndt berndth at gmx.de
Sun Dec 2 19:08:36 CET 2012

On So, 02.12.2012 12:38, Rich Pieri wrote:

>On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:47:04 +0100
>Holger Berndt <berndth at gmx.de> wrote:
>> ... I explained it to you already, and I am explaining it again
>> because you still didn't get it: We are _NOT_ talking about
>> concurrent access to the MAILBOX! Claws Mail will happily let you
>> interact with the same mailbox at the same time, using
>> --alternate-config-dir.
>I say -- and I've always maintained -- that concurrent access to
>mailboxes is bad behavior. Colin agrees. If you disagree then take it up
>with him.

I always said killing people is bad behaviour. My mom agrees. If you
disagree, take it up with my mom.

But I guess you're not even realizing that you're pulling strawmen.

Again: Concurrent mailbox access is not the topic in this thread. It
never was (outside your own misguided posts). The socket does NOT
prevent concurrent mailbox access. I didn't do so in the past, and it
doesn't do so with your patch applied.


More information about the Users mailing list