[Users] [Bug 2828] Use MD5 digest for socket name
berndth at gmx.de
Sun Dec 2 17:09:34 CET 2012
On So, 02.12.2012 00:03, Rich Pieri wrote:
>Enough. I can't deal with this any more. You guys have my proposal, you
>have the logic behind it, and you have a working context diff. YOU
>figure out how you want to implement it.
In fact, we have an implementation for MY proposal  from you which
lacks normalization. You might remember that your proposal was an
additional config option which would have introduced yet more problems.
And we have a discussion whether the socket should be in a public or
private place, because Mones spotted a problem with the public place
which made me reconsider.
So, indeed, somebody should decide whether that problem is considered
too academic, and we don't care, or whether it's worth attacking, in
which case the need for a live-update migration path is the worst part.
More information about the Users